ANNA BELFRAGE

Step inside and steal some moments in another place, another time

Is freezing in a garret a prerequisite?

Chatterton 1856 by Henry Wallis 1830-1916There is this rather romanticised (and antiquated) idea that great art is created by young (mostly) male wannabees who laugh cruel fate in the face while they continue with their creative endeavours, no matter chillblains and empty stomachs, ice-cold draughts and ragged clothes. Our literary hero hoards his candle stumps so as to light his nightly progress with his roman à clef,  but no sooner does dawn tinge the night skies pink but he blows out the little flame, preferring to strain his eyesight to wasting any more of his artificial light source.

Such young men write about PAIN. They write about anguish and despair, about setting off to brave the world alone. Their world is harsh, their female protagonists are generally peripheral, and all that introverted focus results in a rather heavy read – which is why said writer is languishing in a garret to begin with. Now, not all garret-bound writers have written unreadable books. In Sweden, we have our own most brilliant if somewhat depressive and misogynist August Strindberg, who rose from humble beginnings to become a writer of quite some well-deserved renown (and doubtful repute, what with all his women). Great art has undoubtedly arisen from strained circumstances, but is it a necessity to suffer to write/compose/paint masterpieces? No, I would say – rather emphatically. What is required to create masterpieces is talent, perseverance and inspiration.

Irises-Vincent_van_GoghCreating masterpieces does not always result in monetary compensation. Take Van Gogh, for example. Did he ever enjoy the monetary fruits of his labour? Nope. His painting of irises may be one of the more highly valued works of arts in the world, but dear old Vincent spent his latter years in mental confusion (hence the ear business, one assumes) and does not seem to have reaped much material reward, despite increasing recognition of his genius towards the latter years of his (short) life.

Also, there’s the interesting little fact that masterpieces are generally defined by a selected few – an intellectual elite, if you will – and may therefore not necessarily reflect the tastes of the broad masses – and if you want to become rich through your creative efforts, then you had better appeal to the masses. To be brief, one can conclude that while writing masterpieces does not exclude material success, neither does it guarantee the writer will be rolling in money. If you write to earn your living, there may therefore be a need of a certain level of… umm… well, what can we call it? “Prostitution”? (Oh dear; hearts go all a-flutter, don’t they?)

aston_martin_db9-pic-12758Writers who are looking for high level income should choose genre carefully. Crime is a safe bet. Silent male hunk (think Reacher) driven by an inner moral compass but uninterested in cluttering up his life with emotional baggage as he goes about saving the world always seems to sell – mostly to men, who probably nourish a dream of living the simple life and being heroes at least once in their lives. Another safe bet is romance – but here the sub-genres are a veritable tangle to work your way through, and some are more successful than others, so do the research before deciding on whether your male protagonists will prance about in silk hose and breeches, a painted mouche on their cheek and a powdered wig atop their head, or slouch about looking delightful in an Aston Martin DB9 and cashmere (Aaaaaaahhhh, yes…)

The alternative to prostitution – a.k.a. writing what you think the market may want –  is to write what you feel passionate about and to hell with remuneration. In my experience, this leads to much better writing. Much. Okay, so there may only be a minority of people around who want to read about the Sherpa who got on the wrong bus and ended up in Zanzibar (and boy, was that a happy Sherpa: not a freezing mountain in sight to climb, just beautiful pristine beaches and a nice warm climate) but that minority will – hopefully – become your fans. Which is why, of course, I write about love and history, and time travelling and love and the 17th century and love and medieval rebellions and love and religious controversy and … Did I mention love?

Gabriel_Metsu_-_Man_Writing_a_LetterThese days, writing is no longer done on paper with ink that leaves ugly blots, those manuscripts pages then rushed off to be typeset. No, dear people, these days writing is done on computers.Yes, yes; some of us draft – or even write – using pen and paper, but ultimately authors these days will keyboard their characters, their plot and setting, into a precious .docx file that exists in multiple back-ups. (WHAT? You have no back-ups????? Well, you clearly like living on the edge, don’t you?) And once the file is on the computer, it is quite easy to publish it without having to do the agent/publishing house thing – you can do it all on your own. (Luckily, as otherwise those people who really, really want to read about the Sherpa and Zanzibar would never get the opportunity as the target reader group is ridiculously small)

The classic business model regarding books for the latest decades has included the author, the agent and the publisher. Any profit made would be shared by the three interested parties, and so long as the publishing companies controlled what was being published, things worked out pretty well. After all, until recently, if you wanted to read a book you needed to buy the physical printed product, and as long as the publishing houses ensured the market wasn’t flooded by too many books in the same genre, readers would browse what was available and buy, thereby guaranteeing higher sales per title, ergo nice, steady profits. Enter the age of digital publishing. Enter the age of Amazon. (I feel a sudden urge to sing here: “When the moon is in the seventh house, and Jupiter aligns with Mars…” Chorus: “This is the dawning of the age of Aaaamazon, the age of Aaaaamazon, Aaaamazon“)

behemotYes, Amazon is a behemoth that is causing rampant death among many smaller and larger booksellers. Yes, Amazon has reinvented the book industry. Yes, Amazon drives e-book sales. Yes, Amazon has created space (he-he) for unpublished authors to go for it. Yes, Amazon is doing all this for profit. No, Amazon won’t go away – and neither will Smashwords or Kobo or all other similar on-line retailers. Or e-books. Why? Because for the reader, Amazon offers a cheap and accessible service, with the added benefit of e-books being far more environmentally friendly than the printed book.

As a consequence, the traditional business model within the book publishing world is under pressure. This leads to publishing houses having to become more restrictive regarding what they publish. Guaranteed sales need to be relatively high for the company to recoup on its investments. Sales of 10 000 copies will generate approximately 20 – 30 thousand pounds in gross profit, but this is before any promotional costs, any salaries to the people involved in the production as such (you know; editors, jacket designer, proof-readers – plus the overheads, such as the cleaners and the managers and the accountants and the sales reps and…) The book sells 5 000, and the gross taking is roughly 10 – 12 thousand pounds, which doesn’t leave much of a profit – if any –  once all expenses incurred have been deducted. It’s a tough world, the book business – almost as tough as life was back then, in that freezing garret room, where the only source of light and heat was a fluttering candle.

When the basic tenets of an industry change, this creates opportunities for new players. Enter the quality-minded, professional small publishing companies that cater to all those authors who no longer have a chance in hell of getting a contract with one of the traditional publishing companies – not because their book is bad, but because they’re not celebrities, or well-known authors that have an established fan base, or have a book that hits a trending sweet-spot. Or are immensely talented.

So, the enthusiastic as yet unknown author wants to publish, the small publishing house offers a package for self-publication and you have a marriage made in heaven. (A word of warning: double check the publishing house before going with them. You want someone who is serious about what they do)  End result of this matrimony = a book, a lovely, lovely book that has the writer smiling like an idiot while he/she strokes the cover (been there, done that). But is it a quality product? Aha! Key question, ladies and gentlemen, best replied by “Judge not a book by its cover“, because no matter how pretty the cover, it’s the content that matters, right?

for-your-eyes-only-stampIf you write for your own pleasure, you don’t need to worry about edits and formatting, about odd POV shifts, about excessive usage of adverbs. You’re doing if For Your Eyes Only, and so it can be just as unfinished as you let it be. But. Major, major but. You put it out there as a book you expect people to buy, well then you owe all those people a certain basic quality. Formatting is nice, for example. Correct spelling helps ( “You now it’s true!” she said. Err… ). Consistent use of verb tense, of names, of dates – all of this is a minimum. I recently read a book where the protagonist is eighteen on one page, twenty-six three chapters later when two years have passed, and in actual fact he must be sixteen as we are told he is ten years younger than another twenty-six-year-old. Very confusing, let me tell you –  and far from a quality product.

This, I believe, is the rub in the entire self-publishing debate. Too many books are published at a deplorable standard, and IMO it is the company facilitating the publication services that somehow must take a stance here. All books do not appeal to all readers – and that’s okay. Personally, I’d hate reading a book about a Sherpa that ended up in Zanzibar (I think; maybe if Stephen Fry wrote it I might reconsider). But as long as the book lives up to a basic standard, I won’t feel shortchanged if I buy it and then simply don’t like it.  So, dear wannabe writers, do yourself – and your future readers – a favour. Hire an editor. Please. Pretty, pretty please? And as to all those publishing houses that cater to the self-publishing industry (including dear, huge Amazon), how about making editing a prerequisite, huh?

paris-charity-in-a-garret-grangerIf we float back in time to that chilly garret (in Paris, of course it’s in Paris, and Rodolfo is holding Mimi’s cold hand while singing his heart out to her, and…oops, sorry, slipped away there) with our industrious author, we will find the floor around his chair littered with pages, pages where words have been scratched out – whole sentences even. Mr long-suffering author is in the editing phase, and because he is dirt poor and convinced he is the best writer since Molière, he scoffs when his timid muse suggests he let someone else take a look at his finished opus. Grammar, he says in a patronising tone, is for lesser writers than he. He is an artiste, a creator of masterpieces, not for him the ridiculous rules of syntax and spelling. No wonder he’s still stuck in that garret of his, cursing the world for not seeing the beauty of his text.

In conclusion, dear people, writers don’t need garrets. But they do need editors – and readers. And books, they need publishing houses that take the craft of writing seriously – so seriously, in fact, that they won’t set their name to a book (self-published or otherwise) unless it meets a certain standard. Like an ISO 9001 approval, but for books. Can’t be that difficult to put in place, can it? Hello? Mr Bezoz? Did you hear that?

Oh, and if someone feels like developing my Sherpa/ Zanzibar story, I do have a rough outline lying about (you call, Mr Fry, and I’ll come running).

 

 

 

Single Post Navigation

35 thoughts on “Is freezing in a garret a prerequisite?

  1. silverwoodbooks on said:

    Yay…I found an egg! (But I’m going to leave it here for someone else to find).

    Thank you for a wonderful post, Anna. Thoughtful and thought-provoking as always.

    Helen x

  2. Thanks for this Anna, very amusing – love the idea of the Writer preferring to strain his eyes than keep a candle burning. And I think it’s true that writers need editors more than garrets!

  3. Wow! A lot to digest as I read from my cosy writing basement…
    Apposite for spring which for me, a SAD person, gets me out of my mental garret and gets me writing more energetically!

    • I agree re the SAD – although seeing as I live in a country afflicted with very, very, very short days between November and February, I try to compensate with a lot of artificial light. Luckily, I do not live in a 19th century garret…

  4. Wonderful post! This was really great for me to read as I am starting to embrace the craft. I really liked, “The alternative to prostitution – a.k.a. writing what you think the market may want – is to write what you feel passionate about and to hell with remuneration. In my experience, this leads to much better writing.” I will go with my passion and that minority. Yet, I will chose Silverwood Books!

  5. Children's Author Caz Greenham on said:

    Great post Anna, and rather amusing! Writers certainly do need Editors! Have a great easter x

  6. My Aston Martin is so expensive to keep up that I have no choice but to write in a garret (well, a sort of mezzanine actually) and because Jenno, my muse/text-editor/grammar-and-spelling adviser, is who she is, there is no likelihood of ever moving into a luxuriously spacious studio. Quite apart from this, I am unable to identify clearly for whom I am writing, never mind determining a genre. But hope springs eternal, and with the wise counsel provided by your charming blog, I may yet make it into the lower hundred-thousands of the Amazon ratings. Thank you Anna for a charming read.

    • Welcome to the club re the identification of your readers… But I’d say you and Jenno have a very broad appeal, so i wouldn’t worry overmuch. And as to studios, who needs them? Us writers thrive on creating in the midst of life’s bustle.

  7. Leaving a quick comment as I’m battling flu 😦 this post looks so interesting Anna (as all your posts always are!) I’m calling back when I feel a bit better to devour it!

  8. mwills986 on said:

    Very entertaining and thought provoking Anna. You have a wonderful way with words.

  9. Marsha on said:

    Great post. My favorite Easter treat is a tie between Cadbury eggs and Reese’s peanut butter eggs. And Sheena Easton sang For Your Eyes Only. 🙂

  10. A wonderful appraisal of the current state of the publishing world, and alternatives to freezing in a garrett – or possibly how to write from a garrett with a small radiator 😉

  11. Sheena Easton sang that James Bond theme. My favourite Easter treat was babka, a traditional Polish Easter bread, and pierogis made by my grandmother. Now, that she has passed away, it’s my turn to make them for my 90 year old aunt.
    denannduvall(at)gmail(dot)com

  12. Leslie on said:

    I loved your comments on the self-publishing industry! Your comments about editing were spot on. (I think maybe I read that book where the character’s age didn’t quite match up. Perhaps he was a time-traveler?)

  13. If this is a sample of your writing when you are recovering form the flu, well my hat is off to you! Hot Crossed Buns! But Easter Brunch is homemade waffles with fresh strawberries. What ever happened to Sheena Easton..Did she Take the Morning Train somewhere?

  14. Spot on about the need for quality, Anna – one of the main messages in the new book I’ve just co-authored with Dan Holloway, “Opening Up to Indie Authors” – coming to Amazon (dare I say it?!) any day now! Actually, Amazon is by no means all bad – it has enabled so many self-published authors to at least gain some visibility ad income, which they’d never have had without it. It’s also allowed lots of small businesses to reach a worldwide market. But now with more and more publishing platforms opening up – Kobo, iBooks etc – there is even more choice for the self-published author. There’s never been better time to be an indie author, I reckon (she typed from her 21st century author’s garret, complete with little radiator by her desk…)

    • I think Amazon is quite amazing, actually. It requires quite some vision – and staying power – to bring about the revolution withing the book industry that Amazon has wrought. Still, competition is always good. Thanks for stopping by

  15. A really interesting post. The maintenance of quality control is clearly of huge significance for the (self-) publishing industry. For “An Ordinary Spectator”, I didn’t use a formal editor, but did draw on the advice of a couple of “critical friends” for certain passages. And they were just that – critical and friendly – enabling me to re-think some of the presentation and to correct a few factual errors. In my case, also, I have to say that I probably enjoyed the process of self-editing as much as the original composition. In that, I was aided by the fact that some time passed between the initial drafting and final completion, so I was able to look at the content afresh.

  16. Pingback: A fickle taskmaster | Anna Belfrage

  17. Pingback: SilverWood Authors Spring Blog Hop: ‘Springtime and hanging baskets!’ « Hello and welcome to Caz's Devon Blog Diary ~ 'Tis Blogalicious!

  18. Pingback: Making it good in 17th century London | Anna Belfrage

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: